Opinion
Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK(PSG)
10-17-2011
GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff and Counter-Claim Defendant v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, Defendant and Counter-Claim Plaintiff
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125) SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291) TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020) SARA B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857) KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC. JASON SHEASBY (SBN 205455) GARY FRISCHILING (SBN 130583) C. MACLAIN WELLS (SBN 221609) IRELL & MANELLA LLP SANDRA HABERNY, PHD (SBN 260977) IRELL & MANELLA LLP Attorneys for Defendant THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125)
SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)
TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)
SARA B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857)
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC.
JASON SHEASBY (SBN 205455)
GARY FRISCHILING (SBN 130583)
C. MACLAIN WELLS (SBN 221609)
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
SANDRA HABERNY, PHD (SBN 260977)
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA
STIPULATED AGREEMENT ON BRIEFING SCHEDULE CHANGE FOR RESPONSE TO THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA'S LETTER BRIEF MOTIONS FILED OCTOBER 11, 2011
STIPULATED AGREEMENT ON OPPOSITION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on October 11, 2011, defendant, the University of Pennsylvania ("Penn") filed a Letter Brief Motion to Compel Re: Roche Documents and noticed the hearing date for October 18, 2011;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's June 7, 2011 Order, Genentech's response to Penn's motion would be due this Friday, October 14, 2001;
WHEREAS, Genentech's lead counsel who handled the meet and confer process on the issues raised in Penn's motion is unavailable this week due to a trial in another matter;
WHEREAS Genentech has requested and Penn has agreed to a short extension for Genentech to file its response by Friday, October 21, 2011; and
THE PARTIES NOW THEREFORE AGREE, that Genentech will file and serve its oppositions to Penn's motion by Friday, October 21, 2011.
SO STIPULATED:
Respectfully submitted,
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
Samuel Tiu (#216291)
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant GENENTECH, INC.
Respectfully submitted,
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Jason Sheasby (#205455)
Raymond LaMagna (#244821)
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY BY ORDERED that:
Genentech will file and serve its oppositions to Penn's October 11 Motion by Friday,
October 21, 2011. Penn's motion will be calendared for the hearing date of ____ November 1 ____, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. IT IS SO ORDERED
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the attached document has been obtained from Raymond LaMagna, counsel to the University of Pennsylvania, and from Samuel Tiu, counsel to Genentech, Inc.
James A. High Jr. (#240781)
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant GENENTECH, INC.