Opinion
Case No. 5:10-cv-02037-LHK (PSG)
10-06-2011
GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant and Counterclaimant
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Ashok Ramani (#200020) Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim- Defendant GENENTECH, INC. Respectfully submitted, IRELL & MANELLA LLP Raymond LaMagna (#244821) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)
SIDLEY & AUSTIN LLP
SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125)
SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)
TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 265449)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)
SARA B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857)
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC.
JASON SHEASBY (SBN 205455)
GARY FRISCHLING (SBN 130583)
C. MACLAIN WELLS (Bar No. 221609)
SANDRA HABERNY (SBN 260977)
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Attorneys for Defendant THE TRUSTEES
OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA
STIPULATED AGREEMENT ON
BRIEFING SCHEDULE CHANGE FOR
RESPONSE TO GENENTECH'S LETTER
BRIEF MOTIONS FILED OCTOBER 4
Judge: Hon. Paul S. Grewal
STIPULATED AGREEMENT ON OPPOSITION BRIEFING SCHEDULE
WHEREAS, on October 4, 2011, plaintiff Genentech, Inc. ("Genentech") filed two motions: (1) Plaintiff's Letter Brief Motion to Compel Additional Deposition Time and (2) Plaintiff's Letter Brief Motion Seeking a Determination as to Defendant's Claim of Privilege (collectively, "Genentech's October 4 Motions"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's June 7, 2011 Order, oppositions to Genentech's October 4 Motions would ordinarily be due this Friday, October 7, 2001; and
WHEREAS, due to one of the University's main counsel falling ill this week, the parties have conferred regarding the briefing schedule on these motions; and
WHEREAS, despite Genentech's desire to resolve these motions as soon as possible in advance of the November 1 fact-discovery cutoff, it has agreed to a time extension; and
THE PARTIES NOW THEREFORE AGREE: the University of Pennsylvania will file and serve its oppositions to Genentech's October 4 Motions by Wednesday, October 12, 2011.
SO STIPULATED:
Respectfully submitted,
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
Ashok Ramani (#200020)
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant GENENTECH, INC.
Respectfully submitted,
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Raymond LaMagna (#244821)
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY BY ORDERED that:
The University of Pennsylvania will file and serve its oppositions to Genentech's October 4 Motions by Wednesday, October 12, 2011.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the attached document has been obtained from Ashok Ramani, counsel to Genentech, Inc.
Raymond LaMagna (#244821)
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA