Opinion
Case No: 5:10-CV-2037-LHK(PSG)
11-21-2011
GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff and Counter-Claim Defendant v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, a Pennsylvania non-profit corporation, Defendant and Counterclaimant.
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291) TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065) ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020) SARAH B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857) KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC. JASON SHEASBY (SBN 205455) GARY FRISCHLING (SBN 130583) C. MACLAIN WELLS (SBN 221609) IRELL & MANELLA LLP SANDRA HABERNY (SBN 260977) IRELL & MANELLA LLP Attorneys for Defendant THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)
TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 256449)
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)
ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)
SARAH B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857)
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC.
JASON SHEASBY (SBN 205455)
GARY FRISCHLING (SBN 130583)
C. MACLAIN WELLS (SBN 221609)
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
SANDRA HABERNY (SBN 260977)
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Attorneys for Defendant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA
STIPULATED AGREEMENT REGARDING THE HEARING DATE OF GENENTECH'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL (DKT. NOS. 395 AND 396)
STIPULATED AGREEMENT REGARDING THE HEARING DATE OF GENENTECH'S
MOTIONS TO COMPEL
WHEREAS, on November 8, 2011, Genentech filed two motions to compel the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania ("UPENN") regarding Dr. Okudaira and production of Dr. Ferguson's documents (Dkt. Nos. 395 and 396);
WHEREAS, on November 16, 2011, Genentech provided notice of hearing for these two motions for November 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 408);
WHEREAS, Genentech's lead counsel, who was to argue the motions, has an emergency that conflicts with the November 22, 2011 hearing date;
WHEREAS Genentech has requested and UPENN has agreed to move the hearing date to November 29, 2011; and
THE PARTIES NOW THEREFORE AGREE that the Court is requested to hear arguments regarding Genentech's Motions to Compel (Dkt. Nos. 395 and 396) on November 29, 2011 at 10 a.m.
SO STIPULATED:
Respectfully submitted,
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
M. Patricia Thayer (SBN 90818) Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant GENENTECH, INC.
Respectfully submitted,
IRELL & MANELLA LLP
Gary N. Frischling
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
PENNSYLVANIA
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY BY ORDERED that:
The Court will hear arguments concerning Genentech's motions to compel (Dkt. Nos. 395 and 396) on November 29, 2011 at 10 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the attached document has been obtained from Gary N. Frischling, counsel to the University of Pennsylvania.
Tashica T. Williams (SBN 256449)
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant GENENTECH, INC.