From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the Univ. of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
Case No. 5:10-cv-02037-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:10-cv-02037-LHK (PSG)

11-10-2011

GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendant and Counterclaimant

Respectfully submitted, KEKER & VAN NEST LLP Ashok Ramani (#200020) Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim- Defendant GENENTECH, INC. Respectfully submitted, IRELL & MANELLA LLP Raymond LaMagna (#244821) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Raymond LaMagna (CA #244821) Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant The Trustees of the UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA


M. PATRICIA THAYER (SBN 90818)

SIDLEY & AUSTIN LLP

SANDRA S. FUJIYAMA (SBN 198125)

SAMUEL N. TIU (SBN 216291)

TASHICA T. WILLIAMS (SBN 265449)

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

ROBERT A. VAN NEST (SBN 84065)

ASHOK RAMANI (SBN 200020)

SARA B. FAULKNER (SBN 263857)

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

Attorneys for Plaintiff GENENTECH, INC.

JASON SHEASBY (SBN 205455)

GARY FRISCHLING (SBN 130583)

C. MACLAIN WELLS (Bar No. 221609)

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

SANDRA HABERNY (SBN 260977)

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

Attorneys for Defendant THE TRUSTEES

OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

PENNSYLVANIA

STIPULATED AGREEMENT ON

BRIEFING SCHEDULE CHANGE FOR

RESPONSES TO GENENTECH'S

MOTIONS TO COMPEL

Judge: Hon. Paul S. Grewal

STIPULATED AGREEMENT ON OPPOSITION BRIEFING SCHEDULE

WHEREAS, Genentech, Inc. ("Genentech") filed two letter brief Motions to Compel with this Court on November 8, 2011 (Dkts. 395 & 396);

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's June 7, 2011 order regarding letter briefing (Dkt. 262), any responses by the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania ("the University") to Genentech's motions would ordinarily be due on Friday, November 11, 2011;

WHEREAS, because two of Penn's outside lawyers suffered car accidents that affect Penn's ability to prepare oppositions under the current schedule, the parties have conferred regarding giving the University extra time such that the University's oppositions would be due filed on Tuesday, November 15, 2011;

ACCORDINGLY, the parties respectfully request that the Court permit the University to file its oppositions to Genentech's motions on Tuesday, November 15, 2011:

Respectfully submitted,

KEKER & VAN NEST LLP

Ashok Ramani (#200020)

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim

Defendant GENENTECH, INC.

Respectfully submitted,

IRELL & MANELLA LLP

Raymond LaMagna (#244821)

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant

THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

PENNSYLVANIA

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS HEREBY BY ORDERED that:

The University's oppositions to Genentech's November 9, 2011, letter brief motions
shall be due filed on Tuesday, November 15, 2011.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Honorable Paul S. Grewal

United States Magistrate Judge

Attestation of Signature

Pursuant to General Order 45(X), I hereby certify that concurrence in the filing of the forgoing document has been obtained from the signatories.

Raymond LaMagna (CA #244821)

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant The

Trustees of the UNIVERSITY OF

PENNSYLVANIA


Summaries of

Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the Univ. of Pennsylvania

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Nov 10, 2011
Case No. 5:10-cv-02037-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)
Case details for

Genentech, Inc. v. Trustees of the Univ. of Pennsylvania

Case Details

Full title:GENENTECH, INC., Plaintiff v. THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

Date published: Nov 10, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:10-cv-02037-LHK (PSG) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2011)