From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Genc v. Genc

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 8, 2022
No. 1D22-1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2022)

Opinion

1D22-1258

08-08-2022

Aracelis Ramirez Genc, Petitioner, v. Mehmet Genc, Respondent.

Christopher V. Carlyle of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Petitioner. Darby F. Hertz and John J. Kearns of Hertz & Kearns, Gainesville, for Respondent.


Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition-Original Jurisdiction.

Christopher V. Carlyle of The Carlyle Appellate Law Firm, Orlando, for Petitioner.

Darby F. Hertz and John J. Kearns of Hertz & Kearns, Gainesville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

The Court denies the petition for writ of prohibition on the merits.

ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and LONG, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Genc v. Genc

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Aug 8, 2022
No. 1D22-1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2022)
Case details for

Genc v. Genc

Case Details

Full title:Aracelis Ramirez Genc, Petitioner, v. Mehmet Genc, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Aug 8, 2022

Citations

No. 1D22-1258 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 8, 2022)