From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gen. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Cronk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2014
552 F. App'x 742 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 12-15755 D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00588-LRH- VPC No. 12-15791 D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00588-LRH-VPC

01-22-2014

GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee, EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEVADA, Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellee, v. SCOTT CRONK; et al., Defendants-counter-claimants - Appellants. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEVADA, Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Washington corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee, and SCOTT CRONK; et al., Defendants-counter-claimants.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding


Submitted January 15, 2014

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

San Francisco, California

Before: ALARCÓN, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Scott Cronk, Chris Crumley, and Employers Insurance of Nevada appeal from the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of General Insurance Company of America (GICOA). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §1291.

Neither Cronk nor Crumley was entitled to coverage under the plain language of Carson Nugget's uninsured motorist endorsement because they were not "'occupying' a covered 'auto' or a temporary substitute for a covered 'auto'" when injured. Because neither Cronk nor Crumley was a "person insured" under Carson Nugget's commercial automobile policy, their exclusion from uninsured motorist coverage does not violate Nevada's public policy. See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hinkel, 87 Nev. 478, 484 (1971). Nor is section 616C.215(3)(c) of the Nevada Revised Statutes to the contrary, as Cronk and Crumley were not injured "under circumstances entitling [them] . . . to receive proceeds under [their] employer's policy of uninsured or underinsured vehicle coverage." Nev. Rev. Stat. § 616C.215(3).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gen. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Cronk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 22, 2014
552 F. App'x 742 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Gen. Ins. Co. of Am. v. Cronk

Case Details

Full title:GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Washington corporation…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 22, 2014

Citations

552 F. App'x 742 (9th Cir. 2014)