Gen. Impact Glass v. Hanover Ins. Co.

Full title: General Impact Glass & Windows, Corp., Appellant, v. The Hanover Insurance…

Court: Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

319 So. 3d 689 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D21-47

03-24-2021

GENERAL IMPACT GLASS & WINDOWS, CORP., Appellant, v. The HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Appellees.

Daniels, Rodriguez, Berkeley, Daniels & Cruz, P.A., and Jorge L. Cruz, Justin S. Miller and William O. Diab, for appellant. Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Christopher M. Horton and Brian A. Wolf (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee, The Hanover Insurance Company.

PER CURIAM.

Daniels, Rodriguez, Berkeley, Daniels & Cruz, P.A., and Jorge L. Cruz, Justin S. Miller and William O. Diab, for appellant.

Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Christopher M. Horton and Brian A. Wolf (Fort Lauderdale), for appellee, The Hanover Insurance Company.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM. A trial court's determination that the party with the burden of proof has failed to meet that burden will not be overturned on appeal where it is supported by competent, substantial evidence. See, e.g., Tylinski v. Klein Auto., Inc., 90 So. 3d 870, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012).

Affirmed.