From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2009
357 F. App'x 512 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-1434.

Submitted: November 18, 2009.

Decided: December 17, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cv-00234-GCM).

Richard L. Farley, Christopher A. Hicks, Katten Muchin Rosenman, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellants. Andrew A. Vanore, III, R. Scott Brown, Brown, Crump, Vanore Tierney, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Plaintiffs appeal the district court's order entering judgment in Plaintiffs' action against Defendant and declaring repair costs to be the proper measure of covered loss owed to Plaintiffs by Defendant. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Gellman v. The Cincinnati Ins. Co., 602 F.Supp.2d 705 (W.D.N.C. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Dec 17, 2009
357 F. App'x 512 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

Gellman v. Cincinnati Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:Burton A. GELLMAN; The Gellman Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 2009

Citations

357 F. App'x 512 (4th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Black, Sibals & Bryson v. Noe

I think the judgment itself is sufficient. See Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. Harrison, 25 La. Ann. 1. The prayer or…