From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geller v. Republic Novelty Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 1917
180 App. Div. 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)

Opinion

December 28, 1917.

Jeremiah F. Connor, for the appellants.

Merton E. Lewis, Attorney-General [ E.C. Aiken of counsel], and Robert W. Bonynge, for the respondent State Industrial Commission.

Harry D. Mancher, for the respondent, claimant.


The employer was not carrying on a hazardous business. It became necessary to have additional shelving in its store. The work would require an employee about three days. The injured employee was a carpenter who worked by the hour for any one requiring his services. He had worked upon the shelving for two days and was at work upon the last shelf when, on June 25, 1916, he fell from a stepladder and was injured. If we assume that he was engaged in structural carpentry at the time of the injury, it does not follow that the employer was carrying on such hazardous employment. A casual engagement of a carpenter by the hour to repair a store or office does not make the proprietor of the store or office one engaged in structural carpentry. ( Matter of Bargey v. Massaro Macaroni Co., 170 App. Div. 103; affd., 218 N.Y. 410; Coleman v. Bartholomew, 175 App. Div. 122; Matter of Schmidt v. Berger, 221 N.Y. 26; Matter of Kammer v. Hawk, Id. 378.)

We conclude that the employer is not liable for an accident happening to an employee in such casual service. The award should be reversed and the claim dismissed.

All concurred, except LYON, J., dissenting.

Award reversed and claim dismissed.


Summaries of

Geller v. Republic Novelty Works

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 1917
180 App. Div. 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
Case details for

Geller v. Republic Novelty Works

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1917

Citations

180 App. Div. 762 (N.Y. App. Div. 1917)
168 N.Y.S. 263

Citing Cases

National Cast Iron Pipe Co. v. Higginbotham

In Lundgren v. District Court of Washington County (Nov. 15, 1918) 141 Minn. 83, 169 N.W. 488, it is said:…

Lamont v. Intermtn. Realty Co.

"The occasional cleaning and repairing of his own houses did not constitute a trade, business, profession or…