From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gelinas v. City of South Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 22, 1988
522 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1207.

March 22, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Leonard Rivkind, James C. Henderson and Steven D. Robinson, Judges.

Robert D. Korner, Miami, for appellants/petitioners.

John R. Dellagloria, City Atty., for appellee/respondent.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ.


ON RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS


The respondent's renewed motion to dismiss is granted on the authority of Paul v. City of Miami Beach, 519 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Johnson v. Citizens State Bank, 518 So.2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). As in both cases we certify the question presented:

WHEN A PARTY SEEKS APPELLATE REVIEW OF A NON-APPEALABLE ORDER, AND ASSUMING THAT THE NOTICE OF APPEAL IS TIMELY FILED IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL, MUST THE NOTICE OF APPEAL BE FILED IN THE APPELLATE COURT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RENDITION OF THE ORDER IN ORDER FOR THE APPELLATE COURT TO HAVE JURISDICTION TO TREAT THE NOTICE AS A PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI?


Summaries of

Gelinas v. City of South Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 22, 1988
522 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Gelinas v. City of South Miami

Case Details

Full title:RICK GELINAS AND LINDA GELINAS, APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS, v. CITY OF SOUTH…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 22, 1988

Citations

522 So. 2d 104 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Stieglitz v. City Commission

PER CURIAM. The respondent's motion to dismiss is granted on the authority of Gelinas v. City of South Miami,…