From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geico Indemnity Company v. Goldstein

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 24, 2010
791 N.W.2d 106 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 141196.

November 24, 2010.


Order

SC: 141196, COA: 288418, Oakland CC: 2006-073586-NF

By order of September 17, 2010, the parties were directed to file supplemental briefs. On order of the Court, the briefs having been received, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE part III (B) of the Court of Appeals opinion and REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issue whether, because the titled owner of the vehicle involved in the accident maintained an automobile insurance policy on the vehicle issued by plaintiff Geico, and Geico, in turn, filed the written certification with the State of Michigan required under MCL 500.3163(1), the resulting no-fault coverage satisfied the condition for eligibility for personal protection insurance benefits specified by MCL 500.3113(b), even if defendant Goldstein was an "owner" of the vehicle within the meaning of MCL 500.3101(h)(i), thereby obviating any need for the further proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Geico Indemnity Company v. Goldstein

Supreme Court of Michigan
Nov 24, 2010
791 N.W.2d 106 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

Geico Indemnity Company v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. BELINDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Nov 24, 2010

Citations

791 N.W.2d 106 (Mich. 2010)