Geico Indem. Co. v. Mauricio Chiropractic Poinciana, LLC

Full title: GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY AND GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 24, 2020

289 So. 3d 979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5D19-2315 5D19-2317 5D19-2319 5D19-2320 5D19-2322 5D19-2324

01-24-2020

GEICO INDEMNITY COMPANY and Government Employees Insurance Company, Petitioners, v. MAURICIO CHIROPRACTIC POINCIANA, LLC a/a/o Roberto Soto, et al., Respondents.

Peter D. Weinstein, Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, and Rebecca O'Dell Townsend, Louis Schulman and Scott W. Dutton, of Dutton Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioners. Mark K. Delegal and Tiffany A. Roddenberry, of Holland & Knight, LLP, Tallahassee, Amicus Curiae Brief for Personal Insurance Federation of Florida and American Property Casualty Insurance Association, in support of Petitioners. Douglas H. Stein, of Douglas H. Stein, P.A., Miami, for Respondents. Mac S. Phillips, of Phillips Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Chad A. Barr, of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte Springs, Amicus Brief for Floridians for Fair Insurance, Inc., in support of Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Peter D. Weinstein, Michael A. Rosenberg, Thomas L. Hunker, of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Plantation, and Rebecca O'Dell Townsend, Louis Schulman and Scott W. Dutton, of Dutton Law Group, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioners.

Mark K. Delegal and Tiffany A. Roddenberry, of Holland & Knight, LLP, Tallahassee, Amicus Curiae Brief for Personal Insurance Federation of Florida and American Property Casualty Insurance Association, in support of Petitioners.

Douglas H. Stein, of Douglas H. Stein, P.A., Miami, for Respondents.

Mac S. Phillips, of Phillips Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, and Chad A. Barr, of Law Office of Chad A. Barr, P.A., Altamonte Springs, Amicus Brief for Floridians for Fair Insurance, Inc., in support of Respondents.

PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Dep't of High. Saf. & Motor Veh. v. Alliston, 813 So. 2d 141, 145 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) ("[A]n order that provides a result without a written opinion and therefore cannot act as precedent in future cases ... will generally not merit certiorari review in the district court, even if the district court might disagree with the result.").

EDWARDS, HARRIS, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.