From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Paton

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 11, 2016
189 So. 3d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D13–2166.

05-11-2016

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Kelly PATON, Respondent.

James K. Clark of Clark, Robb, Mason, Coulombe, Buschman & Charbonnet, Miami, for petitioner. Bard D. Rockenbach of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach and Richard M. Benrubi of Liggio Benrubi, P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.


James K. Clark of Clark, Robb, Mason, Coulombe, Buschman & Charbonnet, Miami, for petitioner.

Bard D. Rockenbach of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach and Richard M. Benrubi of Liggio Benrubi, P.A., West Palm Beach, for respondent.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the Florida Supreme Court's opinion in Paton v. GEICO General Insurance Co., No. SC14–282, 2016 WL 1163372 (Fla. Mar. 24, 2016), the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

STEVENSON, GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Paton

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
May 11, 2016
189 So. 3d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Geico Gen. Ins. Co. v. Paton

Case Details

Full title:GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. KELLY PATON, Respondent.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: May 11, 2016

Citations

189 So. 3d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)