From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gehring v. Nottingham Lace Works

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 21, 1954
108 A.2d 515 (R.I. 1954)

Opinion

Eq. No. 2214.

October 21, 1954, Decided

For majority opinion, see 106 A.2d 923.

Higgins & McCabe, Eugene V. Higgins, Providence, Sylvester Benjamin, New York City, for petitioner.

Boss & Conlan, Henry M. Boss, James C. Bulman, Providence, for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

After our opinion in the above case was filed, the respondent by leave of court filed a motion for reargument, setting forth therein certain reasons on which it bases its contention that justice requires a reargument of the case. We have carefully considered those reasons and passed upon in reaching the conclusion stated in our opinion.

Motion denied.

CAPOTOSTO, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Gehring v. Nottingham Lace Works

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Oct 21, 1954
108 A.2d 515 (R.I. 1954)
Case details for

Gehring v. Nottingham Lace Works

Case Details

Full title:Betty Jane GEHRING v. NOTTINGHAM LACE WORKS, Inc

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Oct 21, 1954

Citations

108 A.2d 515 (R.I. 1954)
82 R.I. 198
1954 R.I. LEXIS 123