From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gehr v. Gehr

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Jan 11, 2012
B226755 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

B226755

01-11-2012

In re Marriage of NATASHA and NORBERT GEHR. NATASHA GEHR, Appellant, v. NORBERT GEHR, Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BD483136)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING REHEARING


[No Change in Judgment]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on December 21, 2011, be modified as follows:

At the first full paragraph on page 9, after the first sentence, which ends "the further terms of the premarital agreement did not necessarily preclude reimbursement of the separate property expended by Norbert to purchase the condominium," add as footnote 4 the following footnote, which will require renumbering of all subsequent footnotes:
This finding is made only with respect to the condominium. To the extent, if any, that Norbert may have had a claim to reimbursement for other items conveyed to Natasha, such a claim was clearly waived, including by failure to raise it on appeal.

This modification does not effect a change in judgment.

Appellant's petition for rehearing is denied.


Summaries of

Gehr v. Gehr

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Jan 11, 2012
B226755 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Gehr v. Gehr

Case Details

Full title:In re Marriage of NATASHA and NORBERT GEHR. NATASHA GEHR, Appellant, v…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

B226755 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 11, 2012)