From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Geer v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV250-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 28, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:20CV250-HEH

05-28-2020

CHRISTOPHER WAYNE GEER, Plaintiff, v. RICHMOND CITY COURTS-JOHN MARSHALL Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)

By Memorandum Order entered on May 11, 2020, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiff's action. At that time, the Court warned Plaintiff that he must keep the Court informed as to his current address or if he was released. On May 21, 2020, the United States Postal Service returned the May 11, 2020 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER," "ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN," and "UNABLE TO FORWARD." Since that date, Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiff's failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: May 28, 2020
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Geer v. Marshall

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
May 28, 2020
Civil Action No. 3:20CV250-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 28, 2020)
Case details for

Geer v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER WAYNE GEER, Plaintiff, v. RICHMOND CITY COURTS-JOHN MARSHALL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: May 28, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:20CV250-HEH (E.D. Va. May. 28, 2020)