From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GEE v. UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Oct 21, 2003
No. 1:03-CV-147, No. 1:03-CV-176 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 21, 2003)

Opinion

No. 1:03-CV-147, No. 1:03-CV-176

October 21, 2003


ORDER


Plaintiff Doreen Gee filed a lawsuit against UnumProvident Corporation ("UnumProvident"); and directors, officers, and fiduciaries of UnumProvident ("Defendants"), alleging Defendants breached fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1109, owed to her and other participants and beneficiaries of a 401(k) plan established as a benefit for UnumProvident employees (Case File No. 1:03-CV-147). Plaintiff Bonnie Scanlon subsequently filed an essentially identical complaint against the same Defendants, alleging the same underlying facts and asserting the same claims for relief (Case File No. 1:03-CV-176). Both complaints include class action allegations and seek relief on behalf of a class of 401(k) plan participants and beneficiaries.

Pursuant to Rule 42, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "[w]hen actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court . . . it may order all the actions consolidated. . . ." The Court finds these actions involve common questions of law and fact, and consolidation is both necessary and appropriate to avoid unnecessary costs and delay and to maximize judicial resources. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the above-captioned cases CONSOLIDATED for all purposes, including trial, pursuant to Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Court further ORDERS the parties file all documents related to this matter in Case No. 1:03-CV-147, pending final resolution of the cases. Documents previously filed in Case No. 1:03-CV-176 win be deemed to have been filed in No. 1:03-CV-147. Likewise, the Clerk of the Court need not docket future filings in Case No. 1:03-CV-176, as everything filed hereafter in Case No. 1:03-CV-147 will be deemed to have been filed in Case No. 1:03-CV-176. When these consolidated cases are resolved, the final order will be placed in each of the case files, and the cases will then be closed.

In the event a party opposes the consolidation of these cases, that party shall file any objection to this Order on or before Tuesday, October 21, 2003. SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GEE v. UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Oct 21, 2003
No. 1:03-CV-147, No. 1:03-CV-176 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 21, 2003)
Case details for

GEE v. UNUMPROVIDENT CORPORATION

Case Details

Full title:DOREEN GEE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Date published: Oct 21, 2003

Citations

No. 1:03-CV-147, No. 1:03-CV-176 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 21, 2003)