From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gee v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 10, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-2681-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-2681-G (BN)

01-10-2019

STEVE SAMUEL GEE, JR., Petitioner, v. STATE OF TEXAS, AND STACEY D. GEE, Respondents.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The district court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the court ACCEPTS the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The court, therefore, DENIES the relief requested in Steve Samuel Gee, Jr.'s response to willful first amendment retaliation and clear fraud upon the court, rule 60(b) motion to set aside judgment for clear fraud upon the court by judicial officers, and notice of tort claims (docket entry 25) and AWARDS Stacey D. Gee $1,225.70 in costs and actual expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c).

SO ORDERED. January 10, 2019.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gee v. Texas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jan 10, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-2681-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2019)
Case details for

Gee v. Texas

Case Details

Full title:STEVE SAMUEL GEE, JR., Petitioner, v. STATE OF TEXAS, AND STACEY D. GEE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 10, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-CV-2681-G (BN) (N.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2019)

Citing Cases

Clark v. Emp. Funding of Am. (In re Syngenta Prods. Liab. Litig.)

ECF No. 20 at 11 (citing Roussel v. Brinker Intern., Inc., No. CIV.A.H-05-3733, 2010 WL 1881898, at *12 (S.D.…