From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gee v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 3, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-01-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 3, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-01-DBH

01-03-2018

BRIAN NEAL GEE, PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, DEFENDANT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 12, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to counsel, his Report and Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on December 26, 2017, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The Commissioner's decision is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the Recommended Decision.

SO ORDERED.

DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2018

/S/D. BROCK HORNBY

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gee v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Jan 3, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-01-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Gee v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN NEAL GEE, PLAINTIFF v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Jan 3, 2018

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-01-DBH (D. Me. Jan. 3, 2018)

Citing Cases

Barbara v. Kijakazi

this might be cause for remand. See Gee v. Berryhill, No. 2:17-cv-00001-DBH, 2017 WL 6337181, at *4 (D. Me.…