From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gearity v. Golden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2007
39 A.D.3d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 794.

April 17, 2007.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Mark Friedlander, J.), entered January 5, 2006, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Law Office of Michael G. O'Neill, New York (Jeanne M. Weisneck of counsel), for appellant.

Garfunkel, Wild Travis, P.C., Great Neck (Colleen McMahon of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Williams and Sweeny, JJ.


Defendants provided legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for plaintiff's termination, and plaintiff did not meet her consequent burden to show that those reasons were false or unworthy of belief and that the actual reason was her age ( see Ferrante v American Lung Assn., 90 NY2d 623, 629-630; Hardy v General Elec. Co., 270 AD2d 700, lv denied 95 NY2d 765). Indeed, the evidence on the motion discloses that defendant Dr. Golden hired plaintiff when she was 60, and persuaded her to stay on when she tendered her resignation at age 63, after a dispute between her and the office manager ( see Moon v Clear Channel Communications, 307 AD2d 628, 632). In addition, while defendant medical practice may have hired another employee shortly before plaintiff's termination, the record does not substantiate plaintiff's assertion that this employee "replaced her"; the office manager averred that the new employee was a probationary hourly employee whose primary duties were copying and filing ( see Mike v Haylor, Freyer Coon, 169 AD2d 911).


Summaries of

Gearity v. Golden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2007
39 A.D.3d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Gearity v. Golden

Case Details

Full title:HELEN GEARITY, Appellant, v. OWEN GOLDEN, M.D., et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 17, 2007

Citations

39 A.D.3d 343 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3197
834 N.Y.S.2d 138

Citing Cases

In re Goldman

"Notwithstanding the evidence demonstrating that there was friction and hostility in the relationship between…

In Matter of Brody

As to the necessity of a hearing to inquire into the facts, the court in Matter of Venezia ( 25 AD3d 717, 719…