From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GBT Techs. v. Jackson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 24, 2022
2:20-cv-02078-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02078-APG-VCF

10-24-2022

GBT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WARREN JACKSON, individually; GREGORY BAUER, individually; RWJ ADVANCED MARKETING, LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company; W.L. PETREY WHOLESALE COMPANY, INC., an Alabama corporation; DOES I-X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, Defendants.

MARQUIS AURBACH, Brian R. Hardy, Esq., Alexander K. Calaway, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff JENNINGS & FULTON, LTD., Adam R. Fulton, Esq. Attorneys for Robert Warren Jackson, Gregory Bauer and RWJ Advanced Marketing, LLC DARVY MACK COHAN, Darvy Mack Cohan, David Mincin, Attorneys for Defendant W.L. Petrey Wholesale Company, Inc.


MARQUIS AURBACH, Brian R. Hardy, Esq., Alexander K. Calaway, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff

JENNINGS & FULTON, LTD., Adam R. Fulton, Esq. Attorneys for Robert Warren Jackson, Gregory Bauer and RWJ Advanced Marketing, LLC

DARVY MACK COHAN, Darvy Mack Cohan, David Mincin, Attorneys for Defendant W.L. Petrey Wholesale Company, Inc.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff GBT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (“Plaintiff”), defendant ROBERT WARREN JACKSON, defendant GREGORY BAUER, defendant RWJ ADVANCED MARKETING, LLC, and defendant W.L. PETREY WHOLESALE COMPANY, INC. (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. That the above-referenced matter be dismissed with prejudice;
2. That all Parties bear their own attorney fees and costs;
3. That the “UGO Funds” currently being held in the blocked account opened by Plaintiff, which are further described and defined in the Court's Preliminary Injunction
(ECF No. 92), be released to Plaintiff, and that any future UGO Funds be distributed in the manner agreed to by the Parties;
4. That the Court's Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 92) be vacated, and that the $1,000.00 cash bond and all accrued interest posted in Support of the Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 93) be released to Plaintiff; and
5. That any pending hearing and deadlines be vacated.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED on this 21st day of October, 2022 by counsel of record:

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GBT Techs. v. Jackson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 24, 2022
2:20-cv-02078-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2022)
Case details for

GBT Techs. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:GBT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT WARREN…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 24, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-02078-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Oct. 24, 2022)