From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gayton v. Fidani

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 15, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-06758-MCS (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2021)

Opinion

No. 2:20-cv-06758-MCS (JDE)

03-15-2021

RICHARD W. GAYTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RENZO FIDANI II, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

1. Plaintiffs shall take nothing by this action;

2. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Dillon, Powell, and Roberts, Commissioner Blackwell, LASC, Cohen, and Nemiroff & Cohen are dismissed with prejudice; and

3. Plaintiffs' claims against Defendants Fidani, Aserio, Paula Teske & Associates, Department of Children Family Services, Los Police Department Van Nuys Division, Children Law Centre, Malek, Del Rio, Amadore, Archiable, Johnson, Gersh, and Doe defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Dated: March 15, 2021

/s/_________

MARC C. SCARSI

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gayton v. Fidani

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 15, 2021
No. 2:20-cv-06758-MCS (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Gayton v. Fidani

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD W. GAYTON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RENZO FIDANI II, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 15, 2021

Citations

No. 2:20-cv-06758-MCS (JDE) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 15, 2021)