From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaylor v. Goodenow

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 12, 2010
124 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-0330.

March 12, 2010.

In Mandamus and Prohibition.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

This cause originated in this court on the filing of an amended complaint for a writ of prohibition and mandamus adding the Franklin County Board of Commissioners. Upon consideration of relator's motion for emergency stay and expedited alternative writ,

It is ordered that the prohibition claim is dismissed and relator's motion for an emergency stay and expedited alternative writ is denied insofar as it is based on the prohibition claim.

It is further ordered that an alternative writ is granted on relator's mandamus claim, and respondents are sua sponte stayed from enforcing or proceeding on their decisions disqualifying relator's bid and awarding the contract to an alternate contractor pending the court's resolution of relator's mandamus claim.

The respondents shall file an answer to the complaint within seven days of this entry; the parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of this entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondents' brief.


Summaries of

Gaylor v. Goodenow

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 12, 2010
124 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2010)
Case details for

Gaylor v. Goodenow

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 12, 2010

Citations

124 Ohio St. 3d 1513 (Ohio 2010)
124 Ohio St. 3d 1511
2010 Ohio 959
2010 Ohio 919

Citing Cases

Gaylor, Inc. v. Goodenow

{¶ 8} On March 12, we dismissed Gaylor's prohibition claim and denied its motion for an emergency stay and…