From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gay v. Rojas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03128-WJM-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03128-WJM-MEH

03-21-2012

BYRON KYLE GAY, Plaintiff, v. DANNY ROJAS, KRIS KRONCKE, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on March 21, 2012.

Plaintiff's second Motion to Add "City of Denver" as a Defendant, Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [filed March 19, 2012; docket #27] is denied as moot. As stated in this Court's February 27, 2012 order, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), the Plaintiff may file an amended pleading once as a matter of course (meaning, without the need to seek permission from the court) within 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever occurs earlier. In its previous order, the Court explained that, because no responsive pleading or Rule 12 motion had been yet filed, the Plaintiff was well within the time to file an amended pleading without seeking permission from the Court. The Plaintiff did not do so. Since that time, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) on March 7, 2012. Thus, time remains for the Plaintiff to file an amended pleading without seeking permission from the Court.

As with Plaintiff's first motion, he failed to attach a proposed amended pleading to the present motion.


Summaries of

Gay v. Rojas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 21, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03128-WJM-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Gay v. Rojas

Case Details

Full title:BYRON KYLE GAY, Plaintiff, v. DANNY ROJAS, KRIS KRONCKE, and JOHN DOES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 21, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03128-WJM-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 21, 2012)