From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gay v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-1694-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-1694-L

10-03-2011

ZELDA v. GAY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER GRAY, Defendant.


ORDER

Before the court are the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, filed September 14, 2011. Plaintiff did not file any objections.

Plaintiff Zelda V. Gay ("Plaintiff") filed this action against Officer Gray alleging, while Plaintiff was a patient at Baylor Hospital in Garland, Texas, Officer Gray failed to conduct a proper inquiry into an assault reported to him involving Plaintiff and a hospital staff member. The magistrate judge concluded that this case should be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Plaintiff alleges a state law claim and does not allege diversity of citizenship. The magistrate judge also concluded that there is no constitutional right to an investigation by law enforcement officials and thus no federal claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Having reviewed the pleadings, file, and record in this case, and the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge, the court determines that the findings and conclusions are correct. They are therefore accepted as those of the court. Accordingly, the court dismisses this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

Sam A. Lindsay

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gay v. Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Oct 3, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-1694-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Gay v. Gray

Case Details

Full title:ZELDA v. GAY, Plaintiff, v. OFFICER GRAY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Oct 3, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-1694-L (N.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2011)