Gavurnik v. Vantage Labs

Full title: BRUCE GAVURNIK, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE LABS, LLC, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 8, 2022

Civil Action 19-5537-KSM (E.D. Pa. Mar. 8, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-5537-KSM

03-08-2022

BRUCE GAVURNIK, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE LABS, LLC, Defendant.

KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.

ORDER

KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the parties' motions in limine (Doc. Nos. 66, 67, 68, 69, 79) and the responses thereto (Doc. Nos. 70, 71, 73, 74, 84), and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude the EEOC Dismissal and Notice of Rights in response to Charge No. 530-2017-02382 (Doc. No. 67) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude the outcome of the case against his former employer, Home Properties, (Doc. No. 66) is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff's motion in limine to exclude evidence of his prior criminal history (Doc. No. 79) is GRANTED.

4. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude an email that its former in-house counsel, Ken LaFiandra, sent to Gavurnik's counsel (Doc. No. 69) is GRANTED.

5. Defendant's motion in limine to exclude evidence of the Zinman case (Doc. No. 68) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.