From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gavurnik v. Vantage Labs

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 2, 2022
Civil Action 19-5537-KSM (E.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 19-5537-KSM

03-02-2022

BRUCE GAVURNIK, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE LABS, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants Vantage Labs, LLC and Vantage Learning USA, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 63) and Plaintiff Bruce Gavurnik's response (Doc. No. 64), following oral argument, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Gavurnik's retaliation claims is DENIED but the Court DISMISSES Vantage Learning as a Defendant.

It is FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

1. Counsel shall participate in a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley on March 23, 2022 at 9:30 a.m.

Counsel are expected to arrange their calendars in order to attend this conference.

2. No. later than April 4, 2022, each party shall file with the Clerk of Court a pretrial memorandum. The pretrial memoranda shall include the following:

(a) All stipulations of counsel;

(b) A statement of objection to: (i) the admissibility of any exhibit based on authenticity; (ii) the admissibility of any evidence expected to be offered for any reason (except objections to relevancy); (iii) the adequacy of the qualifications of an expert witness expected to testify and (iv) the admissibility of any opinion testimony from lay witnesses pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 701. Such objection shall describe with particularity the ground and the authority for the objection.

(c) Deposition testimony (including videotaped deposition testimony) that the party intends to offer during its case-in-chief. The statement should include citations to the page and line number and the opposing party's counter-designations.

(d) Counsel must prepare one unified and agreed upon set of proposed jury instructions on substantive issues and one proposed verdict form or set of special interrogatories to the jury. If counsel cannot agree on a particular instruction, they must submit their competing versions along with a statement explaining why the Court should give their proposed instruction. Proposed jury instructions must be tailored and personalized for the case and should include accurate quotes from, and citations to, cases and pattern jury instructions where appropriate. If pattern instructions are to be given, those instructions should be taken from the Third Circuit Model Jury Instructions wherever possible. United States Supreme Court or Third Circuit Court of Appeals cases should be cited wherever applicable. In addition to filing the proposed jury instructions and verdict form on the Court's docket, the parties must e-mail the documents in Word format to ChambersJudgeMarston@paed.uscourts.gov.

3. A final pretrial conference will be held on April 12, 2022 at 2:00 p.m., in Chambers. Counsel shall be prepared to address any pending motions in limine, and objections to witnesses and exhibits. It is expected that counsel attempted to resolve all objections to exhibits and testimony prior to the final pretrial conference, leaving for the Court only those objections the parties could not resolve. Counsel are also expected to have discussed with their respective clients prior to the conference the issues to be addressed at any conference with the Court and to come to the conference with all necessary authority. Trial counsel must attend the final pretrial conference and only those attorneys attending the conference may participate in the trial.

4. At the final pretrial conference, the parties shall provide the Court with a copy of each exhibit and two copies of a schedule of exhibits which shall describe each exhibit. Exhibits shall be arranged and tabbed in a three-ring binder.

5. No later than April 19, 2022, counsel shall submit a trial brief on the legal issues to be resolved at trial.

6. Only those exhibits, discovery items and expert witnesses identified in the manner set forth in this Order shall be considered for admission into evidence at trial, unless stipulated to by all affected parties and approved by the Court.

7. The unavailability of a witness will not be a ground to delay the commencement or progress of an ongoing trial. If a witness may be unavailable at the time of trial in the manner defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 32(a)(4), testimony must be presented by oral or videotape deposition at trial.

8. This case will be listed for trial on April 26, 2022 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom TBD. Counsel and all parties shall be prepared to commence trial on that date. All counsel are attached for trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gavurnik v. Vantage Labs

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 2, 2022
Civil Action 19-5537-KSM (E.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Gavurnik v. Vantage Labs

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE GAVURNIK, Plaintiff, v. VANTAGE LABS, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 19-5537-KSM (E.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2022)