From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gavin v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
20-CV-8163 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)

Opinion

20-CV-8163 (JPO)

08-30-2021

CHRISTINA GAVIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge.

By opinion and order dated August 24, 2021, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs fair trial claim, concluding that an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal (ACD) is not a “favorable termination” of criminal proceedings for purposes of a fair trial claim. (Dkt. No. 36 at 5-6.) On August 20, 2021, however, the Second Circuit held that an ACD is a favorable termination in the relevant sense for purposes of a fair trial claim. See Smalls v. Collins, --- F.4th ---, 2021 WL 3700194, at *15-17 (2d Cir. Aug. 20, 2021).

In light of the Second Circuit's clarification of the law, the Court hereby withdraws Section II.A of its August 24, 2021 opinion. As discussed during the telephone conference held on August 30, 2021, upon reconsideration, Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED as to Plaintiffs fair trial claim. Defendants shall file answers to all of Plaintiff s claims on or before September 21, 2021.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Gavin v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 30, 2021
20-CV-8163 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Gavin v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINA GAVIN, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 30, 2021

Citations

20-CV-8163 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 30, 2021)