From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gausnell v. Livingston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Aug 8, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv76 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv76

08-08-2014

CLAYTON GAUSNELL v. BRAD LIVINGSTON, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Clayton Gausnell, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled civil rights lawsuit. The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable orders of this court.

The Magistrate Judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge concerning this matter. The Magistrate Judge recommends that plaintiff's motion to dismiss be granted and this lawsuit dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. A final judgment shall be entered dismissing this lawsuit.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 8 day of August, 2014.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gausnell v. Livingston

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Aug 8, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv76 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Gausnell v. Livingston

Case Details

Full title:CLAYTON GAUSNELL v. BRAD LIVINGSTON, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 8, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:14cv76 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 8, 2014)