From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaurkee v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Jan 7, 2020
Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00001-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00001-O-BP

01-07-2020

MEGUN C. GAURKEE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS , CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case (ECF No. 18), issued on December 19, 2019. No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court.

Accordingly, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner of Social Security's finding that Plaintiff Megun C. Gaurkee is not disabled.

SO ORDERED on this 7th day of January, 2020.

/s/ _________

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Gaurkee v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Jan 7, 2020
Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00001-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2020)
Case details for

Gaurkee v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MEGUN C. GAURKEE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 7, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:19-cv-00001-O-BP (N.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2020)

Citing Cases

Morris v. Saul

The "ALJ is not required to adopt all of a doctor's findings when assigning that doctor's opinion great…