Opinion
No. 08-12-00221-CV
08-15-2012
Appeal from the
291st District Court
of Dallas County, Texas
(TC# F87-69764-U)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This case is before the Court on our own motion to determine whether it should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Because there is no appealable order, we will dismiss.
Appellant filed a pleading in the district court requesting that the court issue an order prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing Appellant's criminal history record and information relating to the offense that gave rise to Appellant's deferred adjudication. The district court determined that Appellant was not entitled to a non-disclosure order and denied the petition.
The Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that there did not appear to be an appealable order and/or judgment, and that the Court therefore intended to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal. The letter advised that unless any party could show grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days from the date of the letter that the matter would be submitted for dismissal. No party responded to the letter.
This Court has appellate jurisdiction over final judgments and certain interlocutory orders. Cantu Servs., Inc. v. United Freedom Assocs., Inc., 329 S.W.3d 58, 62 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2010, no pet.). However, the Texas Government Code does not specifically provide this Court with jurisdiction over an order denying a petition for non-disclosure. See generally TEX.GOV'T CODE ANN. § 411.081 (West 2012); Guinn v. State, No. 05-90-01295-CV, 2010 WL 22817, *1 (Tex.App.--Dallas Jan. 6, 2010, no pet.)(mem. op.)(noting that Court of Appeals did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the denial of a petition for non-disclosure of criminal history record information). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
____________________________________
CHRISTOPHER ANTCLIFF, Justice
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.