From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gatewood v. Veterans Affairs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 5, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03118-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03118-BNB

02-05-2013

RON GATEWOOD, Plaintiff, v. VETERANS AFFAIRS, PSL/et-all, VETERAN AFFAIRS, VA HOSPITAL ENROLLMENT ADM., DR. BRIAN REISS, DEPT OF LABOR AND EMPLMENT [sic], DR. ROBERT KAWASSAKI, HOLLY HEALTHCARE SYS., CCIA INSURANCE, PENNICOL INSURANCE, WORKERS COMP., PSL/HOSPITAL, HOLLY HEALTH OCCP, KAISER PERMANETE [sic], DR. COUILLE, DR. J. TASH BERTON, DR. LOEFFER, DR. ED BAKER, and DR. GRABOWSKI, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, Ron Gatewood, currently resides in Denver, Colorado. Mr. Gatewood, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint. On January 28, 2013, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland entered an order finding that Mr. Gatewood's Complaint is unintelligible and fails to meet Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) requirements. Mr. Gatewood was ordered to file an amended complaint that sets forth a short and plain statement of his claims showing that he is entitled to relief and to identify the proper jurisdiction for his claims. Plaintiff also was directed to name proper defendants. On January 31, 2013, Mr. Gatewood filed an Amended Complaint, but the pleading is unintelligible and fails to comply with Rule 8. The Court, therefore, will dismiss the action.

The Court also certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Gatewood files a notice of appeal he must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to file an amended complaint that complies with the January 28, 2013 Order. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that in forma pauperis status on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 5th day of February, 2013.

BY THE COURT:

______________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Gatewood v. Veterans Affairs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 5, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-03118-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2013)
Case details for

Gatewood v. Veterans Affairs

Case Details

Full title:RON GATEWOOD, Plaintiff, v. VETERANS AFFAIRS, PSL/et-all, VETERAN AFFAIRS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 5, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-03118-BNB (D. Colo. Feb. 5, 2013)