Opinion
Case No. 3:06-cv-41-J-32HTS.
August 17, 2006
ORDER
On August 14, 2006, Defendants filed the Motion to Withdraw Exhibit D of 11 August 2006 Response From the Court File (Doc. #16). The Motion to Delete From Pacer Defendants' Exhibits "A", "C" and "D" to Response to Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. #15) (Doc. #17) was filed by Plaintiff the same day. The Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Delete From Pacer Defendants' Exhibits "A," "C" and "D" to Response to Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. #18) was filed on August 15, 2006.
Collectively, the two filings will be referred to as the Motions.
It appears all parties view at least part of Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. #15; Response) as inappropriately filed. In light of this, and given that Defendants did not separate their exhibits, but rather filed them electronically as a single document, the Motions (Docs. ##16, 17) are GRANTED to the extent the Response (Doc. #15) is STRICKEN. Defendants shall, within three (3) days from the date of this Order, resubmit the Response with the offending information removed therefrom. Otherwise, the Motions are DENIED.
DONE AND ORDERED.