From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gates v. Rowland

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 31, 1998
162 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 96-16537, 96-16575

Submission Deferred December 11, 1997.

Decided December 31, 1998.

Constance L. Picciano, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for defendants-appellants.

Michael W. Bien, Rosen, Bien Asaro, San Francisco, California, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Robert M. Loeb, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellant-intervenor.

Irene M. Solet, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No CV-87-1636 LKK.

Before: FLETCHER and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WHALEY, District Judge.

Honorable Robert H. Whaley, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation.


ORDER

[2] These appeals are hereby submitted and now dismissed pursuant to the stipulation of the parties. Attorneys' fees and expenses shall be awarded to appellees as determined by the district court in the underlying action, pursuant to the periodic fees procedure already in effect, all as stipulated by the parties.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Gates v. Rowland

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 31, 1998
162 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 1998)
Case details for

Gates v. Rowland

Case Details

Full title:JAY LEE GATES; JOHN RONALD BERTRAM, Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNITED STATES of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 31, 1998

Citations

162 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 1998)