From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GATES v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 21, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1743 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1743.

November 21, 2006


ORDER


AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2006, upon consideration of the motion to admit Arthur A. Vogel, Jr., Esquire as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Modine Manufacturing Company (Docket No. 46), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED and Arthur A. Vogel, Jr. is ADMITTED in this case as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Modine Manufacturing Company, provided that (i) he shall familiarize and comport himself in accordance with the Pennsylvania Rules of Professional Conduct and the rules of this Court, and (ii) presenting counsel, to wit, Albert G. Bixler, Esquire, shall continue to have responsibility for this matter during its pendency before the Court. Pursuant to this Order, Arthur A. Vogel, Jr., Esquire, shall be permitted to participate in all aspects of the instant litigation on behalf of the Defendant Modine Manufacturing Company.


Summaries of

GATES v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 21, 2006
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1743 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2006)
Case details for

GATES v. ROHM HAAS COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:GLENN GATES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 21, 2006

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-1743 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2006)