From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gates v. Precision Post Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 7, 1996
74 Ohio St. 3d 439 (Ohio 1996)

Summary

In Gates v. Precision Post Co., 74 Ohio St.3d 439, 439 (1996), the Supreme Court of Ohio held that the "statute of limitations set forth in R.C. § 2305.10 governs personal injury claims arising from products liability statutes set forth in R.C. § 2307.71 et seq...."

Summary of this case from Taynor v. General Motors

Opinion

No. 94-2093

Submitted January 10, 1996 —

Decided February 7, 1996.

CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-94-21.

Hofelich King and John F. King, for appellant.

Jones Bahret Co., L.P.A., Willis P. Jones, Jr. and Peter C. Munger, for appellees.


The cause is before this court upon the certification of the court of appeals that its judgment conflicted with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County in McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (Dec. 16, 1993), Cuyahoga App. No. 65297, unreported, 1993 WL 527880, and with the judgment of the Court of Appeals for Monroe County in Byers v. Consol. Aluminum Corp. (Apr. 12, 1994), Monroe App. No. 716, unreported, 1994 WL 149880, upon the following question:

"[W]hether the six year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.07 or the two-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.10 governs personal injury claims arising from products liability statutes set forth in R.C. 2307.71 et seq."

This court states that the two-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.10 governs personal injury claims arising from products liability statutes set forth in R.C. 2307.71 et seq., and affirms the judgment of the court of appeals on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

MOYER, C.J., WRIGHT, RESNICK, PFEIFER and COOK, JJ., concur.

DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Gates v. Precision Post Co.

Supreme Court of Ohio
Feb 7, 1996
74 Ohio St. 3d 439 (Ohio 1996)

In Gates v. Precision Post Co., 74 Ohio St.3d 439, 439 (1996), the Supreme Court of Ohio held that the "statute of limitations set forth in R.C. § 2305.10 governs personal injury claims arising from products liability statutes set forth in R.C. § 2307.71 et seq...."

Summary of this case from Taynor v. General Motors
Case details for

Gates v. Precision Post Co.

Case Details

Full title:GATES, APPELLANT, v. PRECISION POST COMPANY; BLACK BROTHERS COMPANY ET…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Feb 7, 1996

Citations

74 Ohio St. 3d 439 (Ohio 1996)
659 N.E.2d 1241

Citing Cases

Vaccariello v. Smith

Personal injury claims arising from product liability actions are governed by the two-year statute of…

Taynor v. General Motors

1. Ohio's Savings Statute In Gates v. Precision Post Co., 74 Ohio St.3d 439, 439 (1996), the Supreme Court of…