From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gates v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

345

March 4, 2003.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about November 9, 2001, which, upon a jury verdict in defendant's favor, dismissed the plaintiff's medical malpractice action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Rhona A. Silverman, for plaintiff-appellant.

Steven H. Kaplan, for defendants-respondents.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Rosenberger, Williams, Gonzalez, JJ.


The record demonstrates that the trial court did not exhibit any bias.

The trial court properly denied plaintiff's application made pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky ( 476 U.S. 79). The record supports the court's finding that the race-neutral reasons offered by defendant were not pretextual, and that finding is entitled to great deference, particularly where the assessment turns on the credibility of the party exercising the challenge (see People v. Hernandez, 75 N.Y.2d 350, 356-357, affd 500 U.S. 352).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Gates v. Goldstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2003
303 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Gates v. Goldstein

Case Details

Full title:ELBERT NATHANIEL GATES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAUL GOLDSTEIN, M.D., ET…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 163 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 882