From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GateGuard, Inc. v. Goldenberg

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 28, 2021
20 Civ. 1609 (AJN) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2021)

Opinion

20 Civ. 1609 (AJN) (GWG)

12-28-2021

GATEGUARD, INC., Plaintiff, v. ABI GOLDENBERG et al., Defendant.


ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

With regard to defendants' motion to compel arbitration (Docket # 69), the defendants have argued that, in the event that the Court finds that the contract claim is arbitrable and the fraud claim is not, the fraud claim should be stayed pending the arbitration of the contract claim. See Docket # 81 at 15. Because this particular argument was raised for the first time in defendants' brief, we will give plaintiff the opportunity to respond to it if it wishes. Any response may be made by letter filed on or before January 7, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

GateGuard, Inc. v. Goldenberg

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 28, 2021
20 Civ. 1609 (AJN) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2021)
Case details for

GateGuard, Inc. v. Goldenberg

Case Details

Full title:GATEGUARD, INC., Plaintiff, v. ABI GOLDENBERG et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 28, 2021

Citations

20 Civ. 1609 (AJN) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2021)