From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaston v. Great Neck Union Free School Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1994
204 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 31, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Becker, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment is denied.

On October 29, 1990, the plaintiff Luis Gaston was injured while in the employ of the third-party defendant, Bay Welding, Inc., and while working on a boiler in the basement of the Saddle Rock Elementary School. The school was owned and operated by the defendant third-party plaintiff Great Neck Union Free School District. The plaintiff commenced a negligence action against the Great Neck Union Free School District. Thereafter, the Great Neck Union Free School District served a third-party complaint upon Bay Welding, Inc., seeking, inter alia, indemnification on the ground that Bay Welding, Inc., in violation of the contract for the work on the boiler, had failed to procure general liability insurance on behalf of Great Neck Union Free School District, or to have Great Neck Union Free School District named as an additional named insured on the policy of Bay Welding, Inc. The Supreme Court granted summary judgment in favor of the Great Neck Union Free School District, finding that Bay Welding, Inc., had failed to produce proof that it obtained the required insurance. We now reverse and deny summary judgment.

The contract for the work on the boiler is ambiguous with respect to whether Bay Welding, Inc., is required to obtain general liability coverage for the benefit of the Great Neck Union Free School District. Bay Welding, Inc., contends that it complied with the terms of the contract by providing Workers' Compensation coverage. Contrary to the contention of the Great Neck Union Free School District, Bay Welding, Inc., properly preserved this claim for appellate review by contending, in the Supreme Court, that it had obtained the insurance coverage required by the contract. We further find that a trial is necessary to resolve the ambiguity as to what type of coverage the parties intended to require under the terms of their agreement. Accordingly, summary judgment is denied. O'Brien, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Gaston v. Great Neck Union Free School Dist

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 31, 1994
204 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Gaston v. Great Neck Union Free School Dist

Case Details

Full title:LUIS GASTON, Respondent, v. GREAT NECK UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 31, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 683 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 438

Citing Cases

M.B.S. Love Unlimited v. Jaclyn Realty Assoc

These issues of fact must be resolved at trial. Accordingly, the Supreme Court erred in granting summary…

Belile v. Cae-Link Corporation

Because there are triable issues of fact whether the purchase order was a part of the agreement between the…