From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

GASS v. SCHLOTFELDT

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma
Feb 23, 2006
No. C05 5602RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 23, 2006)

Opinion

No. C05 5602RBL.

February 23, 2006


ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECUSAL


This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Stanley Gass' Motion for Recusal [Dkt. #19]. Mr. Gass alleges that the court is biased against him as evidenced by its "disparagement, denunciation and condemnation" of Mr. Gass, and its stated admiration for Hon. Robert Bryan, prior to a hearing in another matter, on December 17, 2003. The Motion is not supported by an affidavit, a transcript, or by the facts. The court did not make any "pre-hearing" remarks to Mr. Gass on that occasion, nor does it do so to any litigant.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. The judge shall also disqualify himself in circumstances where the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)-(b)(1).

There is no factual basis for concluding that this court's impartiality might reasonably be questioned in this matter. Therefore, it is Ordered that the undersigned Judge DECLINES to recuse voluntarily.

Mr. Gass' Motion for Recusal [Dkt. # 19] is REFERRED to Chief Judge Robert Lasnik under Local Rule GR 8(c) for decision.


Summaries of

GASS v. SCHLOTFELDT

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma
Feb 23, 2006
No. C05 5602RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 23, 2006)
Case details for

GASS v. SCHLOTFELDT

Case Details

Full title:H. STANLEY GASS et al., Plaintiffs, v. ALBERT F. SCHLOTFELDT, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Tacoma

Date published: Feb 23, 2006

Citations

No. C05 5602RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 23, 2006)