From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gasper v. Hartley

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 28, 2009
Civil Case No. 08-cv-01749-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 28, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Case No. 08-cv-01749-LTB-KLM.

April 28, 2009


ORDER


This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on April 6, 2009 (Doc 23). Applicant has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted and Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc 15) is GRANTED and the Application for Writ Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as moot and for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Gasper v. Hartley

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Apr 28, 2009
Civil Case No. 08-cv-01749-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Gasper v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:RANDY W. GASPER, Applicant, v. STEVE HARTLEY, Warden, Limon Correctional…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Apr 28, 2009

Citations

Civil Case No. 08-cv-01749-LTB-KLM (D. Colo. Apr. 28, 2009)

Citing Cases

Sherman v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.

The court is mindful that Ms. Sherman is not represented by counsel, but “that does not excuse [her] conduct…

Rivera v. Univ. of Colo. Hosp. Auth.

The court is mindful that Ms. Rivera does not have counsel, but “that does not excuse [her] conduct here.”…