From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaspard v. Breakfast Toms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 14, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-02397 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2019)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-02397 TLN CKD P

01-14-2019

CHARLES GASPARD, Plaintiff, v. THE BREAKFAST TOMS, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By an order filed September 6, 2018, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do s would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Following two extensions of time, plaintiff has failed to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee within the time permitted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that:

1. This action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

2. All pending motions (ECF Nos. 13, 14, 15) be denied as moot.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be served and filed within fourteen days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 14, 2019

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/gasp2397.fifp.docx


Summaries of

Gaspard v. Breakfast Toms

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 14, 2019
No. 2:18-cv-02397 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Gaspard v. Breakfast Toms

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES GASPARD, Plaintiff, v. THE BREAKFAST TOMS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 14, 2019

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-02397 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2019)