From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gaspard v. Castillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 13, 2012
No. 1:08-cv-01484 DGC (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:08-cv-01484 DGC

03-13-2012

Arthur Gaspard, Plaintiff, v. D. Castillo, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Defendants have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 59) pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment seeks to have your case dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case.

Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment. Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material fact - that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the Defendants' declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be entered against you. If summary judgment is granted, your case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.

Rule 56.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure also requires that you include with your response to the Motion for Summary Judgment a separate statement of facts in opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Your separate statement of facts must include numbered paragraphs corresponding to the Defendants' ("moving party's") separate statement of facts:

(b) Any party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall file a statement, separate from that party's memorandum of law, setting forth: (1) for each paragraph of the moving party's separate statement of facts, a correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether the party disputes the statement of fact set forth in that paragraph and a reference to the specific admissible portion of the record supporting the party s position [for example, affidavit, deposition, discovery response, etc.] if the fact is disputed; and (2) any additional facts that establish a genuine issue of material fact or otherwise preclude judgment in favor of the moving party. Each additional fact shall be set forth in a separately numbered paragraph and shall refer to a specific admissible portion of the record where the fact finds support. Each numbered paragraph of the statement of facts set forth in the moving party's separate statement of facts shall, unless otherwise ordered, be deemed admitted for purposes of the motion for summary judgment if not specifically controverted by a correspondingly numbered paragraph in the opposing party's separate statement of facts.
LRCiv 56.1(b). You must also cite to the specific paragraph in your statement of facts that supports any factual claims you make in your memorandum of law:
(e) Memoranda of law filed in support of or in opposition to a motion for summary judgment, including reply memoranda, shall include citations to the specific paragraph in the statement of facts that supports factual assertions made in the memoranda.
LR.Civ 56.1(e).

Additionally, Rule 7.2(e) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a motion including its supporting memorandum, and the response including its supporting memorandum, each shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages, exclusive of attachments and any required statement of facts. Unless otherwise permitted by the Court, a reply including its supporting memorandum shall not exceed eleven (11) pages, exclusive of attachments. Attachments shall exclude materials extraneous to genuine issues of material fact or law.
LRCiv 7.2(e).

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, together with a separate Statement of Facts and supporting affidavits or other appropriate exhibits, no later than March 30, 2012. The Court will not grant extensions to this deadline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file a reply within 15 days after service of Plaintiff's response. The Court will not grant extensions to this deadline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment will be deemed ready for decision without oral argument on the day following the date set for filing a reply unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

________________________

David G. Campbell

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gaspard v. Castillo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Mar 13, 2012
No. 1:08-cv-01484 DGC (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Gaspard v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:Arthur Gaspard, Plaintiff, v. D. Castillo, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Mar 13, 2012

Citations

No. 1:08-cv-01484 DGC (D. Ariz. Mar. 13, 2012)