From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garza v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 15, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-CV-0647 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-CV-0647

04-15-2015

RAFAEL ENRIQUE RUIZ GARZA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent


() MEMORANDUM

On April 2, 2015, Petitioner, Rafael Enrique Ruiz Garza, an inmate currently incarcerated at the Correctional Institution at Moshannon Valley, Philipsburg, Pennsylvania ("CI-Moshannon Valley"), filed the above-captioned action, seeking "immediate deportation pursuant to I.N.A. § 242 (h) and 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (h)(2)(A)." (Doc. 1). For relief, Petitioner seeks to be deported without having to complete the remainder of his sentence. (Id. at pp. 1-2). Furthermore, Petitioner states that "with full faith and willingness waives his right for deportation hearings before the completion of his sentenced imprisonment." (Id.). Consequently, Petitioner's motion will be construed as seeking habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Bratini v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44175, *1 n.1 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2015) (Brann, J.) (construing petitioner's action requesting to be immediately deported without having to complete the remainder of his federal sentence as a section 2241 habeas petition). For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner's action will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. DISCUSSION

. Attached as an exhibit to the Petition is a March 5, 2015, Order issued by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado denying Petitioner's March 2, 2015, motion for "immediate deportation pursuant to I.N.S. 242(h) as amended in 8 U.S.C. 1252(h)(2)(a)." (Doc. 1, pp. 4-5); see United States of America v. Rafael Enrique Ruiz-Garza, 11-CR-00028 (D. Col. filed Dec. 28, 2010). In reaching its decision, the court stated that 8 U.S.C. § 1231(a)(4)(B)(i) "does not grant the Court the authority to modify defendant's sentence, and [] defendant has identified no other basis that would give the Court the authority to do so...." (Id.).

. "Habeas corpus review under § 2241 'allows a federal prisoner to challenge the "execution" of his sentence.' Woodall v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 432 F. 3d 235, 241 (3d Cir. 2005). Review is available 'where the deprivation of rights is such that it necessarily impacts the fact or length of detention.' Leamer v. Fauver, 288 F.3d 532, 540 (3d Cir. 2002)." Bratini v. United States, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44175, *1 n.1 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 3, 2015) (Brann, J.).

Habeas corpus petitions pursuant to section 2241 "may only be sought in the district court having jurisdiction over a petitioner's custodian." Id. at *2 (citing Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 426, 442 (2004); Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 494-95 (1973)). Although CI-Moshannon Valley's mailing address is in Philipsburg, Pennsylvania, which is located in Centre County and "within the confines of the Middle District of Pennsylvania," CI-Moshannon Valley "is actually located in Decatur Township, Clearfield County, Pennsylvania, which is within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania." Bratini, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44175, *2 (citing Tsoukalas v. United States, 215 F. App'x 152 (3d Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (jurisdiction over a section 2241 petition filed by a CI-Moshannon Valley inmate rests within the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania)). Therefore, "[a]s recognized in Tsoukalas, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the Warden of [CI-Moshannon Valley]." Id. at *3.

. Here, the only named Respondent is the United States of America. (Doc. 1, p. 1). However, "[t]he only properly named Respondent in a federal habeas corpus action is Petitioner's custodial official, in this case the [CI-Moshannon Valley] Warden." Id. at *1-2 n.2 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 2242).
--------

"A court may transfer any civil action for the convenience of the parties or witnesses, or in the interest of justice, to any district where the action might have been brought." Id. (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)). As a result, this action will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania pursuant to section 1404(a). A separate Order will be issued. Dated: April 15, 2015

/s/ William J. Nealon

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garza v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Apr 15, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-CV-0647 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Garza v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL ENRIQUE RUIZ GARZA, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Apr 15, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15-CV-0647 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 15, 2015)