Opinion
02-22-00051-CR
05-05-2022
Dakota Morales Garza, Appellant v. The State of Texas
Do Not Publish Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b)
On Appeal from the 90th District Court Young County, Texas Trial Court No. 11153
Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Bassel, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Elizabeth Kerr, Justice
On May 10, 2019, the trial court revoked Dakota Morales Garza's deferred-adjudication community supervision and adjudicated Garza guilty of aggravated robbery and sentenced him to 45 years' confinement. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03. Proceeding pro se, Garza filed a notice of appeal on March 18, 2022, nearly three years too late. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a).
Because Garza's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we notified Garza by letter of our concern that we thus lacked jurisdiction over his appeal. In our letter, we explained that because Garza did not move for a new trial, his notice of appeal was due June 10, 2019, but was not filed until March 18, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1); see also Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). We warned Garza that we could dismiss his appeal for want of jurisdiction unless, within ten days, he or any other party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Ten days have passed, and we have received no response.
A timely filed notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to perfecting an appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). If a notice of appeal is untimely filed, we must dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 523. Because Garza's notice of appeal was untimely, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).
Garza may be entitled to relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07.