From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garza v. Richmond

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Apr 11, 1923
249 S.W. 889 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Opinion

No. 6889.

March 7, 1923. Rehearing Denied April 11, 1923.

Appeal from Maverick County Court; W. A. Bonnett, Judge.

Action by Pablo de la Garza against R. E. Richmond. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

David E. Hume, of Eagle Pass, for appellant.

H. E. Veltmann, of Brackettville, for appellee.


Appellant sued appellee for the sum of $300, evidenced by four checks, two for $50 each, and two for $100 each. The defense was that the checks were given for gambling debts in Mexico. The court rendered judgment in favor of appellee.

The evidence, while quite meager, is sufficient to show that appellee had gone across the Rio Grande to Piedras Negras, and while there became intoxicated and began playing at roulette, with $75 he had gone over with, and, after losing that sum, obtained the $300 from appellant on his checks, and soon lost that on the roulette table. The evidence indicates that appellant kept a saloon and a gambling house, and that the $75 and the amounts advanced on the checks were lost on the gaming device of appellant, and all went into his coffers. Appellant not only got the $75, but also got back the money for which the checks were given.

The checks were given for gambling purposes at a gaming table being run in the interest of appellant. He lost nothing, and the court very properly refused to lend itself to the collection of a debt founded on a gambling consideration. This is well settled by Texas decisions.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Garza v. Richmond

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio
Apr 11, 1923
249 S.W. 889 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)
Case details for

Garza v. Richmond

Case Details

Full title:GARZA v. RICHMOND

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, San Antonio

Date published: Apr 11, 1923

Citations

249 S.W. 889 (Tex. Civ. App. 1923)

Citing Cases

Castilleja v. Camero

The courts held that a federal court sitting in Texas could enforce such a claim, governed by the law of…

Mayfield v. Son

But the trial court expressly found, as he was authorized to do under the evidence, that the note was given,…