From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Garza v. Herbst

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Mar 28, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-105 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-105

03-28-2018

JOSE FIDENCIO GARZA, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER HERBST, et al, Defendants.


ORDER

The Court has received the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R") of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case is assigned (Dkt. No. 14). The time to file objections has passed, and no objections have been filed. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b) (setting 14-day deadline to file objections); see also M&R, Dkt. No. 14 at 13 (advising parties of the 14-day deadline).

After independently reviewing the record and applicable law, the Court ADOPTS the M&R (Dkt. No. 14) and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three-Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.

Final Judgment will be entered separately.

SIGNED this 28th day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

Hilda Tagle

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Garza v. Herbst

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION
Mar 28, 2018
CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-105 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)
Case details for

Garza v. Herbst

Case Details

Full title:JOSE FIDENCIO GARZA, Plaintiff, v. JENNIFER HERBST, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

Date published: Mar 28, 2018

Citations

CIVIL NO. 2:17-CV-105 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 28, 2018)