holding that Title VII does not impose individual liability on supervisory employees
Summary of this case from Braun v. Ultimate Jetcharters, Inc.No. 95-672.
December 4, 1995.
C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 59 F. 3d 1391.
holding that Title VII does not impose individual liability on supervisory employees
Summary of this case from Braun v. Ultimate Jetcharters, Inc.holding that an individual defendant cannot be held personally liable under Title VII and a claim against an individual defendant “essentially merges” with the claim against the agency
Summary of this case from Stewart v. Gatesholding that Title VII does not impose individual liability on supervisory employees
Summary of this case from Wortham v. Akron Public Schoolsholding that, "while a supervisory employee may be joined as a party defendant in a Title VII action, that employee must be viewed as being sued in his capacity as the agent of the employer, who is alone liable for a violation of Title VII."
Summary of this case from Macintosh v. Building Owners and Managers Association Int'l.addressing the 1991 offset
Summary of this case from Moro v. StateFull title:GARY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Dec 4, 1995
See Smith, 24 F. Supp.2d at 963; 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(17) (stating that the "reasonable standards" must be…
Smith v. PalmerSection 1396a(a)(17)(a) also requires that these standards be consistent with the objectives of the Medicaid…