Gary v. Hartley

Full title: LOUIS GARY, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Acting Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 30, 2009

CV 07-01796 DSF (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2009)

Opinion

LOUIS GARY, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Acting Warden, Respondent. No. CV 07-01796 DSF (SS) United States District Court, C.D. California. March 30, 2009

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. The Petition is DENIED and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein by United States mail on Petitioner and on counsel for Respondent.