From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Gary v. Discovery Commc'n, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 6, 2012
Case No. 12-10521 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-10521

06-06-2012

KEVIN A. GARY, Plaintiff, v. DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION, INC., Defendant.


Honorable John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER DENYING APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Plaintiff Kevin A. Gary filed an Application for Appointment of Counsel in this matter. In his pro se complaint, Plaintiff alleges a claim for libel against Defendant.

The appointment of counsel in a civil case is a privilege and not a constitutional right, one that should be allowed only in exceptional cases. Lopez v. Reyes, 692 F.2d 15, 17 (5th Cir. 1982). The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has advised that district courts, in considering an application for appointment of counsel in civil cases, "should at least consider plaintiff's financial resources, the efforts of plaintiff to obtain counsel, and whether plaintiff's claim appears to have any merit." Henry v. City of Detroit Manpower Dep't., 763 F.2d 757, 760 (6th Cir. 1985). In reviewing Plaintiffs application, the court finds no exceptional circumstances for the appointment of counsel.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff s Application for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED.

____________________________

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Gary v. Discovery Commc'n, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 6, 2012
Case No. 12-10521 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Gary v. Discovery Commc'n, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN A. GARY, Plaintiff, v. DISCOVERY COMMUNICATION, INC., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-10521 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 6, 2012)